border

border
Electronic Patient Referrals a Promising Alternative to
Face-to-Face Consultation
Article Featured in August 2016 Issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
(OAK BROOK, Illinois, July 28, 2016) Joint Commission Resources, Inc. today released the August 2016 issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. The issue features the article, “Minding the Gaps: Assessing Communication Outcomes of Electronic Preconsultation Exchange,” by Erika Leemann Price, MD, MPH, and co-authors, on the development and use of an electronic referral and consultation system at Zuckerberg San Francisco General.  

New @JC_Resources journal article assesses outcomes of electronic referrals at #zuckerbergSFGH  
 
     TWEET THIS
The system, eReferral, was developed in response to the shortcomings of specialty referral systems in primary care, which can lead to missed and delayed diagnoses. It was piloted for the gastroenterology clinic and then rolled out for medical and surgical specialties across the health care system (San Francisco Health Network).

Price et al. evaluated communication and referral outcomes for patients referred to the gastroenterology clinic through eReferral who were not scheduled for in-person visits. Results showed that for 68 percent of referrals reviewed in the study, patients were not ultimately considered to require in-person gastroenterology clinic appointments or were appropriately redirected for scheduling via other routes. About half of these patients (32 percent of all referrals reviewed) were not scheduled because they were resolved via preconsultation exchange. Very few (3 percent) patients received emergency or hospital care while awaiting resolution of gastroenterology referrals.

In an accompanying editorial, “Electronic Referrals: Not Just More Efficient, but Safer, Too,” Christopher Stille, MD, MPH, states that the eReferral system “enables identification of referrals at risk of being lost to follow-up, something that might be useful even in a nonelectronic referral system. This capability alone could significantly enhance patient safety by triggering enhanced follow-up for those patients.”

The remaining articles from the August 2016 issue are:

Global Health
SafeCare: An Innovative Approach for Improving Quality Through Standards, Benchmarking, and Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Michael C. Johnson, MSc, MA; Onno Schellekens, MSc; Jacqui Stewart; Paul van Ostenberg, DDS, MS; Tobias Rinke de Wit, PhD; Nicole Spieker, PhD

SafeCare was created to provide innovative health care standards; surveyor training; a grading system for quality of care; a quality improvement process that is divided into achievable, measurable steps to facilitate incremental improvement; and a private sector–supported health financing model. More than 800 primary and secondary facilities in six sub-Saharan African countries have participated in SafeCare.

Accreditation and Certification
Hospital Disease-Specific Care Certification Programs and Quality of Care: A Narrative Review
Eyad Musallam PhD, MSN, RN; Meg Johantgen, PhD, RN; Ingrid Connerney, DrPH, MPH, RN

Disease-specific care certification (DSCC) was developed to improve the quality and performance of programs or services that may be based within or associated with a hospital or other health care organization. In the first known narrative review on the topic, only six articles were identified that reported empirical data. More research studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of DSCC in improving outcomes of care, particularly patient-centered outcome measures.

How Does Disease-Specific Care Certification Affect Quality and How Can We Measure It?
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP; Scott Williams, PsyD

In an accompanying editorial, the authors present a theoretical model to guide research on the association of certification with quality.

Performance Improvement
Implementing Delivery Room Checklists and Communication Standards in a Multi-Neonatal ICU Quality Improvement Collaborative
Stacie C. Bennett, MD; Neil Finer, MD; Louis P. Halamek, MD; Nick Mickas, MD; Mihoko V. Bennett, PhD; Courtney C. Nisbet, RN, MS; Paul J. Sharek, MD, MPH

To promote optimal communication during active neonatal resuscitation, the Readiness Bundle (RB) was integrated within the larger change package deployed in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative’s 12-month Delivery Room Management Quality Improvement Collaborative, in which 24 neonatal ICUs participated. The RB consisted of (1) a checklist for high-risk neonatal resuscitations and (2) briefings and debriefings to improve teamwork and communication in the delivery room. The RB was rapidly adopted, with compliance sustained for 6 months after completion of the collaborative. Inclusion of the RB in the next generation of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines is encouraged.

Safety Culture
Patient Safety Culture and the Second Victim Phenomenon: Connecting Culture to Staff Distress in Nurses
Rebecca R. Quillivan, MS; Jonathan D. Burlison, PhD; Emily K. Browne, DNP; Susan D. Scott, PhD, RN; James M. Hoffman, PharmD

In a cross-sectional survey study, 169 (47.2 percent) of 358 nurses at a specialized pediatric hospital completed two surveys—one on patient safety culture and the other on second victim experience and support. The dimension nonpunitive response to error was significantly associated with reductions in the dimensions psychological, physical and professional distress (p < 0.001). Reducing punitive response to error and encouraging supportive coworker, supervisor and institutional interactions may be useful strategies to manage the severity of second victim experiences.

###

Joint Commission Resources, Inc.
Joint Commission Resources, Inc. (JCR), a wholly controlled, nonprofit affiliate of The Joint Commission, is the official publisher and educator of The Joint Commission. JCR is an expert resource for health care organizations, providing consulting services, educational services, and publications and software, to assist in improving safety and quality and to help in meeting the accreditation standards of The Joint Commission. JCR provides consulting services independently from The Joint Commission and in a fully confidential manner. Visit www.jcrinc.com for more information.

 

border
Joint Commission Resources
 

 
   
IN THIS ISSUE:

Minding the Gaps: Assessing Communication Outcomes of Electronic Preconsultation Exchange

Electronic Referrals: Not Just More Efficient but Safer, Too

Plus...

SafeCare: An Innovative Approach for Improving Quality Through Standards, Benchmarking, and Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Hospital Disease-Specific Care Certification Programs and Quality of Care: A Narrative Review

How Does Disease-Specific Care Certification Affect Quality and How Can We Measure It?

Implementing Delivery Room Checklists and Communication Standards in a Multi-Neonatal ICU Quality Improvement Collaborative

Patient Safety Culture and the Second Victim Phenomenon: Connecting Culture to Staff Distress in Nurses

Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Are you a reporter?
A review copy of the journal is available to reporters upon request:


REQUEST JOURNALIST COPY
 
 

 
   
About The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

About Joint Commission Resources

Print-friendly news release PDF
 
 


 
Elizabeth Eaken Zhani
Media Relations Manager
630-792-5914
Email

Katie Looze Bronk
Media Relations Specialist
630-792-5175
Email
 
 
 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
 


 

 
 

 
 
 
border