What Does a ‘High Performing’ Health Care Delivery System Mean?
New Study: Theres No Consensus
Study in the September issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
(OAKBROOK TERRACE, Illinois, August 24, 2017) – The concept of a “high-performing” health care delivery system has gained increasing interest from purchasers, payers and policymakers. However, in a new study published in the September issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, researchers reviewed literature over 10 years and found no consensus on what defines a high-performing health care delivery system or health care organization.

@TJCommission journal study finds no consensus on what defines a high-performing #healthcare delivery system  
 
     TWEET THIS
The study, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), “What Defines a High-Performing Health Care Delivery System: A Systematic Review,” by Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, PhD, policy researcher, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, and assistant professor of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,
Los Angeles, and co-authors, is a systematic review of the 2005 to 2015 literature to determine if there is a commonly used, agreed-on definition of a high-performing health care delivery system or organization.

Results showed no consistent definition of a high-performing health care system or organization among the 57 articles included in the review. High performance was variably defined across different dimensions, including:

  • Quality (93 percent of articles)
  • Cost (67 percent)
  • Access (35 percent)
  • Equity (26 percent)
  • Patient experience (21 percent)
  • Patient safety (18 percent)
Seventy-five percent of the articles used more than one dimension to define high performance, but only five used five or more dimensions. The most commonly paired dimensions were quality and cost at 63 percent.

“The absence of a consistent definition of what constitutes high performance and how to measure it hinders our ability to compare and reward health care delivery systems on performance, underscoring the need to develop a consistent definition of high performance,” note the authors.  

In an accompanying editorial, “High-Performing Health Care Systems: High Performance Toward What Purpose?,” Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD, senior vice president of Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, states that “A high-performing health system should be defined, simply, as one that is more likely to achieve its purpose. Until we are clear on the purpose, performance will suffer.”

Also featured in the September 2017 issue:

  • “Optimizing Care Transitions: Adapting Evidence-Informed Solutions to Local Contexts”
  • “Understanding Facilitators and Barriers to Care Transitions: Insights from Project ACHIEVE Site Visits”
  • “A Multicomponent Fall Prevention Strategy Reduces Falls at an Academic Medical Center”
  • “Do Hospitals Support Second Victims? Collective Insights From Patient Safety Leaders in Maryland”
  • “Using Simulation to Improve Systems-Based Practices”
  • “Improving Pain Management and Safe Use of Opioids: A Call for Papers”

For more information, visit The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety website.           

###

Note for editors
The article is “What Defines a High-Performing Health Care Delivery System: A Systematic Review” by Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, PhD; Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD; Marissa Silverman, MPH; Aneesa Motala, BA; and Paul G. Shekelle, MD. The editorial is “High-Performing Health Care Delivery Systems: High Performance Toward What Purpose?” by Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD. The article and editorial appear in The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, volume 43, number 9 (September 2017), published by Elsevier.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety (JQPS) is a peer-reviewed journal providing health care professionals with innovative thinking, strategies and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. JQPS is the official journal of The Joint Commission and Joint Commission Resources, Inc. Original case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or the new application of methodologies, research studies, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

 
 

 
   
Image

ACCESS FULL ARTICLE

ACCESS FULL EDITORIAL
 
 

 
   
Image

NEW JQPS MEDIA RESOURCES
 
 

 
   
About The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

About performance measurement

Print-friendly news release PDF
 
 

 
 

 
FB
Twitter
LinkedIn
 
 


 
Katie Looze Bronk
Media and Communications Specialist
630-792-5175
Email
 
 
TwitterFollow us on Twitter @MediaTJC
 

 
FB
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
Pinterest
Vimeo
YouTube